CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
News & Views

Canadian pension giant abandons net zero target

CPP Investments, one of the world’s largest pension funds, has quietly dropped its net zero targets, amid growing investor doubts over meeting Paris climate goals

Content Tags: Paris Alignment  Canada 

CPP Investments, the C$714bn pension giant managing the retirement savings of more than 22m Canadians, withdrew its net zero commitment earlier this week. The decision was met with strong criticism from environmental campaigners.

The fund, which had only set its net zero target three years ago, made no mention of the change in its Annual Report and Accounts, released this week. Instead, it stated only that “achieving net zero by 2050 remains a widely adopted goal and critical ambition for many companies, countries and international organisations”, without confirming whether it still upholds this ambition.

However, in the Q&A section of its website, CPP explicitly states that it no longer maintains a net zero by 2050 commitment. It cites “recent legal developments in Canada”, including increased pressure to adopt standardised emissions metrics and interim targets, and claims these do not reflect the complexity of a global investment portfolio.

The reversal was first reported by Canadian climate campaign group Shift, which said the change was made on Wednesday. 

Commenting on the news, a spokesperson for CPP Investment stressed that the fund had not changed its approach to climate investment: "it's more about coherence and consistency" they said, adding: What hasn’t changed are the actions we take to integrate sustainability into our investment strategy. We continue to expect investment due diligence processes to identify material sustainability factors, including those related to climate change, and integrate the findings into investment decisions and ongoing asset management.

"There is increasing pressure to adopt interim targets, many of which don’t reflect the complexity of global investment portfolios like ours or differentiate between the control that an operating company has over its assets and the limited influence that investors have over the strategy of their investees.

"As the world continues its pursuit of a net-zero economy by the middle of the century, we are here to perform a much-needed, productive, patient and engaged capital provider function, based on investment insights. Our responsibility to 22 million Canadians is a strong commitment to identify, evaluate, monitor and act on the factors that will drive the world’s path and aspiration to net zero around the middle of the century" CPP Investments said.



NZI Annual Conference | 21.10.2025 | London Stock Exchange | Register here


Shift strongly criticised the decision, highlighting that it had been taken without consulting pension fund members or the wider public.

“This isn’t just a step backwards. It’s a failure of responsibility. CPPIB is legally required to manage our retirement savings in our best long-term interest, not to fund fossil fuel expansion that jeopardises both our planet and our financial future,” said Shift.

The announcement comes only a month after former UN climate envoy Mark Carney won the Canadian election, suggesting a potential shift in public opinion towards a more progressive stance on climate policy.

The rollback appears to be influenced by increasing regulatory demands. The Canadian Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is introducing more stringent reporting requirements for federally regulated financial institutions, including CPP Investments.

Despite the move, CPP Investments said its commitment to sustainability integration remains unchanged. However, it warned that “forcing alignment with rigid milestones could lead to investment decisions that are misaligned with our investment strategy”.

Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) reporting is already mandatory for large institutional investors in the UK, Brazil, the European Union, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, and Switzerland.

In its Annual Report and Accounts, CPP Investments stated that under the most extreme scenario for physical climate risk – a “hot house world” – up to 4% of the fund’s market value could be at risk.

This article has been amended on 22.05. to include a response from CPP Investments

Content Tags: Paris Alignment  Canada 

Related Content