CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
Aerial view of an oil refinery and chemical plant with smoking chimneys at sunset, Shutterstock
News & Views

Financing of new fossil fuel sites surges in 2025

Global banks have ramped up funding for new fossil fuel sites last year, with US banks in particular doubling down while European banks scaled back on fossil fuel finance, new research shows

Content Tags: Banking  Paris Alignment 

The world’s largest banks continue to expand financing of the fossil fuel industry, with more than $906bn committed to fossil fuel finance in 2025 alone, according to the latest Banking on Climate Chaos Report released today.

Now in its 17th year, the annual report produced by a consortium of NGOs including Sierra Club, Reclaim Finance and others acts as a key indicator for the direction of travel on fossil fuel finance; it is frequently cited by asset owners engaging with banks on transition planning.


NZI Climate Solutions Summit | 23 June | London | register here


But the latest figures show that banks continue to fund the expansion of fossil fuels, with new finance to the industry increasing by 8% year on year.

Against the backdrop of a global energy crisis, funding for key fossil fuel sectors increased significantly, with even coal reporting an increase in new funding.

The three largest individual recipients of bank financing globally were all midstream oil and gas companies last year, with LNG / methane being the fastest growing segment, the report shows. Venture Global, the single largest fossil fuel borrower, received some $33bn in new funding alone on the back of rising concerns about energy security. Meanwhile, only 5 of the top 65 banks have LNG export terminal exclusion policies, the report states.

Despite pledges to phase out coal, financing for coal mining surged 77% in 2025, to now $84bn; funding for coal power plants rose by 40% and now stands at just over $80bn.

Doubling down on oil production, banks expanded upstream financing from $192bn to $217bn and midstream expansion financing from $139bn to $255bn.

Since the signing of the Paris Agreement, banks have provided $8.7tn in financing to the oil, coal and gas sectors.

However, the report also highlights regional divergence: while US banks have expanded their activities, with JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America ranking as the world’s biggest financiers alongside Japanese MUFG, European banks have changed their stance.

US banks now account for 32% of all fossil fuel financing, acting as the single largest regional source of fossil fuel finance. They are closely followed by Canadian lenders. The five big Canadian banks—Royal Bank of Canada, Scotiabank, Toronto-Dominion Bank, CIBC and BMO—increased their fossil fuel financing by over 27% in 2025, up to nearly $70bn. All five banks had announced their departure from the Net Zero Banking Alliance in January 2025.

Meanwhile, BNP Paribas reduced fossil fuel deals by 28%; UBS by 36%; and La Caixa by 34%. This is despite the fact that UBS departed from the Net Zero Banking Alliance last year.

BNP in particular has delivered a significant turnaround. Only four years ago, the bank faced legal threats over its role in financing fossil fuels; it has since ceased participating in conventional bond issuances for the oil and gas sector and pledged to direct 90% of its energy production financing toward low-carbon sources by 2030.


Longview Networks: Institutional Investment Conferences and Summits


Content Tags: Banking  Paris Alignment 

Related Content