CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
Adam Matthews, co-chair of corporate programmes at the IIGCC and chief responsible investment officer at the Church of England Pensions Board
News & Views

IIGCC’s firm warning to oil and gas firms: New net zero standard ‘not easy to meet’

IIGCC's Adam Matthews explained the ‘tough standard’ looks to hold oil firms to account while acknowledging transition challenges

Yesterday, the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC) launched a new framework for investors to assess alignment of oil and gas companies’ transition plans with a 1.5oC climate scenario.

The framework should help inform investors’ corporate engagement priorities and escalation strategies, and help them to better understand the transition risk in their portfolios, according to the IIGCC.

Explaining the new standard in more detail, Adam Matthews, co-chair of corporate programmes at the IIGCC, said: “This is a tough standard clearly setting out the public disclosures needed to enable investors to understand the nuance of a company transition plan, including winding down as a legitimate strategy." 

He warned: "It will not be easy to meet and indeed is not designed to be from day one - but is a standard companies should commit to and strive to achieve."

Matthews, who is also chief responsible investment officer at the Church of England Pensions Board, added that “the standard levels the disclosure playing field and will distinguish between those genuinely seeking to transition and those that are not." In turn this will serve to support investors understanding of risk within their holdings.”

Metrics

In total, there are 90 metrics used in IIGCC’s oil and gas framework, ranging from measurement of short term emissions targets, a comprehensive decarbonisation strategy, and disclosures in areas such as methane emission.

The framework is designed to complement the sector-neutral Climate Action 100+ Company Benchmark, with the IIGCC publishing the standard’s initial public assessments of the largest oil and gas companies across Europe and North America expected in late 2023.

bxs-quote-alt-left

The standard levels the disclosure playing field and will distinguish between those genuinely seeking to transition and those that are not.

bxs-quote-alt-right
Adam Matthews

The publication of the standard follows a two year process led by IIGCC with support from the Transition Pathway Initiative, investors and regional investor groups.

Provisional indicators were published in September 2021 and subsequently tested in a pilot study covering five major European oil and gas companies; BP, Eni, Repsol, Shell and TotalEnergies.

Recent setbacks to net zero targets

On the release of the standard, Matthews stated that the Russian invasion of Ukraine had impacted the net zero goals of the oil and gas sector. 

He claimed that while energy security needs have meant short term adjustments to approaches, the “allure of the short term war profit” has led to some firms back pulling back from the mandates that they had been given by shareholders in transition plan votes at previous AGMs.

While Matthews did not mention BP by name, the firm received criticism last year for revising its net zero planning after shareholder approval of its climate plans, following record profits for the firm amid high natural gas prices.

bxs-quote-alt-left

There is a misalignment of motivations and drivers that some are seeking to exploit.

bxs-quote-alt-right
Adam Matthews

Matthews also called out the seeming discrepancy between the pressures put on listed companies compared to State Owned Enterprises when it comes to the emissions of oil and gas industry.

An example of an SOE currently targeted by the CA100+ in Asia is Saudi Aramco, the state oil and gas firm and one of the largest firms in the world by revenue.

While the initiative is continuing to engage with the firm, Aramco has not met any of the initiative’s ten goals including a net zero by 2050 target or decarbonisation strategy.

“We are at a cross roads in the transition and how investors engage with the short term and longer term. There is a misalignment of motivations and drivers that some are seeking to exploit and play off against each other”, said Matthews.

Last month the IIGCC launched a new project to support investors aligning their portfolios with the goals of the Paris Agreement. 

The so-called Net Zero Engagement Initiative, which includes 93 participating investors, will develop an engagement strategy for each company, the IIGCC said.


Related Content