CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
Briefs

Asian and European investor demand drives comeback for clean energy stocks

Despite the headwinds of the US administration’s Big Beautiful Bill, clean energy stocks appeared to outpace the traditional energy sector amid growing demand from Asian investors

The US administration’s reversal of many clean energy incentives introduced as part of the Inflation Reduction Act was widely anticipated to pose major challenges for clean energy stocks. Indeed, some clean energy firms have faced a challenging year with share prices for firms like Orsted or Vestas dropping by close to 30% year to date.

However, in the first half of 2025, more widely diversified ESG and clean energy funds appeared to recover, according to new IEEFA research. The note, based on Morningstar data, highlights that global sustainable funds continued to draw strong investor interest in 2024, drawing in $31bn in net inflows. Markets turned more cautious in Q1, with sustainable funds reporting outflows of $8.6bn against an increasingly uncertain market environment and the introduction of the EU’s new SFDR rules.

Researchers at the IEEFA highlight an interesting pattern of regional divergence, with investors from the US remaining cautious, demand for sustainable funds slumped by 4% in Q1, while some Asian markets appeared to turn a corner, albeit from a much lower base.

While China has reported net outflows from sustainable funds for the past three years, it reported marginal inflows for the first time in Q1, amid growing investor demand for Chinese ETFS, which recorded RMB1.1 trillion (around USD153.5 billion) in net capital inflows in 2024, marking a historic high and a 104% increase from 2023, according to IEEFA .

Similarly, Taiwan has seen a stark growth of its ETF market, which is now the third largest in Asia, with sustainable funds reporting consistent inflows for the past two years.

Performance has been one reason for solid investor demand, Despite challenges for individual stocks, the MSCI World Selection Index (formerly the MSCI World ESG Index, renamed in February 2025) has kept pace with the broader market. Similarly, the The iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN US) returned 15.6% gains to investors year-to-date as of 27 June 2025, compared to 5% for the S&P500 index, and just 1.2% for the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE US).

Content Tags: Europe  Asia  In-Brief 

Related Content