CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
Briefs

Cenovus, Suncor and Exxon among the oil giants topping institutional exclusion lists

Climate change has become they key reason for excluding companies from institutional portfolios with a handful of international oil firms dominating exclusion lists.

Rising global temperatures have become a key concern for institutional investors, with 40% of all global exclusions being motivated by concerns around climate change.

Despite the sharp rise in oil prices, a growing number of institutional investors have opted to exclude oil firms from their portfolio, according to a new exclusion tracker released by Dutch research provider Profundo in collaboration with a collective of ten campaign groups Friends of the Earth Netherlands, PAX and the Rainforest Action Network.

The Exclusion Tracker, which considers the portfolios of 86 institutional investors across 16 countries reveals that climate change is now the most commonly cited reason for excluding a company from portfolios, with 40% of investors saying they are excluding companies over climate concerns, followed arms manufacturers which account for 17% and tobacco producers accounting for 12%.

Leading the blacklist on climate change are Canadian oil form Cenovus Energy and Petroleum Refinery company Suncor who have been excluded from 52 of the 86 investors surveyed.

Norges Bank is one investor that has lost confidence in both firms, warning already back in 2020 of “omissions that on an aggregate company level lead to unacceptable greenhouse gas emissions.”

The Canadian oil firms are closely followed by energy and mining giant China Energy Investment Corporation, Shandong Energy Group and US oil firm Exxon Mobil, who made it on the blacklist of 51 investors.

Exxon Mobil has been excluded by some fund managers from their climate transition funds and also been dumped by a number of institutional investors, including Nest in the UK.

By highlighting the companies that were most frequently excluded, the campaign groups hope to exercise pressure on other investors to follow suit. “Financial institutions that continue financing companies on the exclusions lists of other financial institutions may be at reputational risk” campaigners warn.

But against a backdrop of rising oil prices, share prices in Cenovus and Suncor have risen more than 10% year to date, a trend that could deter some investors from selling their stakes. 


Related Content