CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
Briefs

EU revamps ESG ratings industry in fresh investment push

The EU taxonomy on sustainable activities has released a new package of measures including regulations intended to clear up the ESG ratings provider industry.

ESG ratings play an important role in Europe's sustainable finance market as they provide information to investors and financial institutions regarding investment strategies and risk management on ESG factors.

Currently the ESG ratings market currently suffers from a lack of transparency, and the EU Commission is proposing a regulation to improve the reliability ratings activities.

According to an EU statement, the new rules will enable investors to make better informed decisions regarding sustainable investments. The proposal will also require that ESG rating providers offering services to investors and companies in the EU be authorised and supervised by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA).

Mairead McGuinness, commissioner for the Financial Services, Financial Stability and Capital Markets Union, said: “We have the foundations of the sustainable finance framework in place. Now is time to build on them.

“We are bringing more transparency and integrity to the market by introducing rules on the operations of ESG rating agencies. Enhancing the usability and coherence of the sustainable finance framework will be our key priority. We also need to reap the full potential of transition finance to ensure that all companies irrespective of their starting points can have adequate tools and support for their transition efforts towards sustainability.”

The EU Taxonomy underpins the bloc’s sustainable finance framework and is intended to act as an important market transparency tool while preventing greenwashing.

The implementation of the taxonomy caused controversy last year with natural gas and nuclear included in the list of environmentally sustainable economic activities and the nations of France and Germany split over the issue.

Also included in the most recent updated package was the proposed set of EU Taxonomy criteria for economic activities making a “substantial contribution to one or more of the non-climate environmental objectives”, namely sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources, transition to a circular economy, pollution prevention and control, and protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems.

In the UK, the Financial Conduct Authority proposed a Code of Conduct for ESG data providers in November last year.

Content Tags: Policy  ESG  Greenwash  Europe  In-Brief 

Related Content