CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
Briefs

Octopus Investments bets on carbon credits for expansion plans

Octopus Investments has announced the launch of its natural capital strategy this week. The new initiative aims to generate carbon removal credits through conservation and land management, offering investors sustainable returns and contributing to the transition to net zero emissions.

The strategy will focus initially on the UK, targeting land acquisitions with potential for conservation. It will explore various revenue opportunities tailored to each project, including property restoration, biodiversity net gain credits, regenerative agriculture, ecotourism, and renewable energy.

Alex Godfrey has been appointed as the investment director for the strategy. Godfrey, who joins Octopus from Savills where he was head of Natural Capital, brings over 15 years of experience in investment banking, venture building, and environmental consulting. His expertise includes carbon markets, biodiversity, and water management.

Under the direction of Mike Toft, senior fund manager at Octopus, the strategy will emphasise data-led monitoring and the co-benefits of biodiversity, aiming to improve ecosystem quality, permanence, and transparency.

Octopus Investments plans to grow its assets under management from £13bn to £50bn by 2030. The firm has previously launched several funds, including those focused on sustainable infrastructure and affordable housing.

The Natural Capital Strategy is part of Octopus's ongoing expansion into institutional business and its commitment to addressing climate change challenges.

The global carbon market can be distinguished between the unregulated voluntary carbon markets, and various initiatives by political institutions such as the European Union to establish regulated carbon markets. A key challenge for these regulated carbon markets will be the pricing of these carbon credits.

The EU announced this week that it is considering introducing emissions removal credits into its carbon market, a move which could significantly bolster global carbon credit markets. The EU has so far banned the use of international carbon credits due to concerns about the pricing and transparency around international voluntary carbon credits.

The UK currently has an emissions trading scheme in place which caps the total use of carbon but does not formally factor in carbon credits. A recent Kings College research points out that the inclusion of carbon credits into the emissions trading scheme could provide a significant boost to the UK’s net zero efforts.

The use of carbon credits to offset emissions was also at the forefront of a recent dispute within the Science Based Targets initiative, with critics warning of greenwashing risks.


More on this:

NZI with Nawar: What is behind the carbon credits row at the SBTi?


Related Content