CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
Briefs

USS and University of Exeter call for ‘radical shift’ in measuring climate risk

USS, the UK’s largest pension scheme and the University of Exeter have called for a “radical and urgent” shift in climate scenario modelling.

Researchers and investors at USS argued that most current scenarios underestimate both the economic damages of climate change and the potential benefits of taking action.

In a report,“No time to lose”, researchers outlined four new climate scenarios aimed at presenting shorter term and more realistic horizons to inform investment decision making.

Mark Cliffe, University of Exeter Visiting Fellow and lead author, outlined that a failure to tackle climate change would in turn also mean that corproate net zero targets currently in place are not realistic.

“Many organisations, not least in the investment community, are committed to playing their part in halving global greenhouse emissions by the end of the decade. It is disturbing that only in the most optimistic of our four scenarios does this look to be plausible. We have no time to lose.”

Roaring 20s or global meltdown?

In the best case, the “roaring 20s” scenario, proactive climate policies and dynamic markets create powerful positive feedback loops. More extreme weather events could focus minds and create a sense of global solidarity to tackle climate change.

A second scenario, “Green Phoenix” assumes that climate action is initially upended by stagflation, the geo-political fallout of a stalemate in Ukraine and badly-handled weather shocks. But as popular anger builds and civil society gradually emboldens more enlightened businesses and local governments step up and roll out mature green technologies, but progress is patchy and erratic

Third, in the event of a “boom and bust scenario” a sharp rise in fossil fuel prices driven by a resurgence of economic growth could spark policy action backing more investment in renewable energy and a just green transition.

Fourth, a meltdown scenario warns that climate change policy could become a casualty of mounting geopolitical tensions. This in turn could feed into extreme weather events being badly handled, triggering famines, mass migration and political instability.

Finance impact

While climate scenarios as such are not unusual, the report stands out for factoring in their impact on the short term, outlining how climate change could affect politics and finance over remainder of the decade.

In the event of a roaring 20’s scenario, green funds would unsurprisingly witness a surge in inflows, another key beneficiary would be emerging markets, which would benefit from a sharp rise in foreign direct investment and more favourable lending conditions to fund the transition to net zero.

Conversely, in a meltdown scenario, emerging markets could be hardest hit and witness capital outflows combined with a rise in borrowing costs, leading to more sovereign debt defaults. Chinese debt in particular could become increasingly unsustainable.

Mirko Cardinale, head of investment strategy and Advice emphasised that the outcomes of this research will have a tangible impact on USS’ investment strategy: “Moving forward, we intend to develop a long-term investment outlook informed by the scenarios and draw out investment implications for capital markets expectations, top down portfolio construction, and country/sector preferences" he explained. 


Related Content