CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
News & Views

Danish pension fund divests from oil and gas firms expanding in production

At Danish pension fund P+'s AGM this week members overwhelmingly backed a resolution to tighten the investors fossil fuel policy

The Danish pension fund for academics P+, which manages around $23bn (€21.2bn) of assets, has announced that it will no longer invest in oil and gas companies that are expanding production.

At P+’s AGM this week, 78% of members supported a resolution, backed by the board, to cease investment in fossil fuel companies planning to invest in new oil and gas fields or new coal power plants.

The tabled resolution was filed by the fund’s members and asks P+ to update its investment policy for holdings in the fossil fuel sector compatible with the Paris Agreement.

Reacting to the adoption of the new policy, Sofie Gry Fridal Hansen, a beneficiary of P+ and filer of the resolution, said: “I strongly support this new policy. Time is running out fast, and the green transition cannot wait any longer.

“The world is fully capable of transitioning without the help of the fossil fuel companies. Therefore, if they will not transition, they should get out of our way, and as investors we should divest. If, in the future, they choose to transition, we will reconsider reinvesting in those companies."

Previously, P+’s exclusion policy was focused solely on companies that generated a significant amount of their revenue from fossil fuels.

However, the new policy adoption positions P+ alongside other Danish pension funds – €19.5bn AkademikerPension, €25.8bn AP Pension, and €16.6bn Lægernes Pension – which have also restricted investment in fossil fuel companies.

Katrine Ehnhuus, a board member of P+, said in a post on LinkedIn: “Fossil expansion is not compatible with the Paris Agreement's goal of keeping temperature rises below 1.5°C. This is the unequivocal conclusion of both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the UN's panel of experts on climate change (IPCC). The members of P+ have therefore drawn the consequences of this with today's big decision.”

In the past, Danish pension funds have struggled to decide whether the IEA’s guidance should be incorporated into their investment principles, despite the group warning that 60% of the value in the oil and gas sector could become worthless in a Paris-aligned transition scenario.

Mikael Skou Andersen, P+ member, economist, professor, environmental science, and former vice-chair of the scientific committee of the European Environment Agency, said: "I believe this is a wise and timely decision. The bell tolls over new investment in coal, gas and oil, as yet another reputable pension fund is on course for additional fossil fuel divestment of its €20bn assets.”

Total divestment

Elsewhere in Europe, some pension funds have chosen to fully divest from oil and gas companies, with €237.8bn Dutch Pension Fund PFZW announcing in February that it would sell off its €2.8bn stake in Shell due to its “insufficient progress in the transition to a cleaner energy mix”.

Alongside PFZW, €500bn ABP announced last month that it would no longer be investing in companies that are not managing the risks of “climate or biodiversity damage that is inherently linked to their business activities, with no realistic prospect of improvement”.

This move comes as the pension fund divested €15bn from oil, gas and coal investments within its portfolio in the first quarter of 2023 following an announcement in 2021 that it would stop investing in fossil fuel producers.


Related Content