CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
News & Views

Nature takes centre stage as London kicks off Climate Action Week

The nexus between nature and climate is emerging as one key theme at London’s Climate Action Week, with investors highlighting the opportunities in supporting ecosystem restoration

Content Tags: Policy  Nature  UK 

Putting a price on nature has emerged as a key challenge that investors hope to address, as industry leaders gathered at London’s Guildhall to launch this year’s London Climate Action Week. The event aims to kickstart debate ahead of the COP30 summit in Brazil, home to the Amazon rainforest, where nature is also expected to feature high on the agenda.

A sign of growing investor interest is the more widespread adoption of TNFD reporting, suggested Tony Goldner, CEO of the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD), who described the process as “nature hushing on steroids”.

At COP16 in Colombia last year, over 500 financial organisations representing some $17trn in assets under management had committed to TNFD reporting. Seven months on, that figure has grown to nearly 600 backers representing almost $20trn in assets, Goldner said. “There is a huge amount of work that is going on under the surface,” he shared.

Claudine Blamey, chief sustainability officer at Aviva, disagreed with the idea that nature hushing is on the rise, arguing that investors have become increasingly vocal about the need to recognise the financial risks of nature loss.


NZI Climate Solutions Summit | 11.09.2025 | London | find out more here


“The challenge comes from an operating model that is not giving nature a value,” she said, stressing: “We need to stop calling nature an externality and internalise the costs of nature loss.”

Aviva recently launched a carbon removal fund, which invests in a combination of nature-based and engineered carbon removal solutions, targeting an average annual return of 8% over a 25-year period. Last week, UK master trust NatWest Cushon announced its backing for the strategy. 

The fund is currently invested in a mix of carbon forestry and restoration, with scope to invest in engineered carbon removal ten years down the line. For now, however, nature remains the focus. “We are seeing great potential in nature-based solutions for carbon removal because they have prices attached to them,” Blamey said. “We need to attach prices to other bits of nature to be able to do the same.”

A key challenge in turning insights on nature loss into investment decisions has been a lack of clarity on the type of information investors need, argued Nicola Ranger, executive director and professor in practice, Natural Capital, Risk and Finance at the London School of Economics.

“We often get confused between biodiversity data and data on ecosystem services,” she said, arguing that the latter is especially crucial for understanding nature’s impact on investments. “You need to know about water, soil quality and pollinators to understand if your investments in wheat are going to be operational,” she added.

The LSE is expected to publish an in-depth study on the financial materiality of nature later this week, drawing on over 600 pieces of evidence. The theme of financing nature will also be explored further on Friday, when the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) and the Grantham Research Institute at LSE release new research examining opportunities for strategic investment in bioeconomy solutions.

Content Tags: Policy  Nature  UK 

Related Content