CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
News & Views

“Unprecedented” private market demand for nature-based solutions

Investors are tapping into a once-in-a-generation wave to drive decarbonisation and halt biodiversity loss, AXA IM claims

An “unprecedented” private market demand for nature-based solutions (NbS) reflects a “once-in-a-generation investment opportunity”, according to AXA IM portfolio managers.

NbS typically aim to protect, sustainably manage, and restore natural ecosystems while delivering social and economic benefits.

This demand comes from three main pools of capitals. Firstly, there are classic asset owners that see NbS investments as a “valuable” part of their decarbonisation strategy. Then, there are the corporates that are interested in “securing access to the outcomes financed” by NbS. The final group is investors that have “made the connection” between NbS and climate and social objectives.

“NbS in in the top three conversations that we have with clients when it comes to discussing their alternatives exposure to nature-based opportunities,” said Jonathan Dean, deputy head of natural capital & impact PE at AXA IM.

Those conversations often focus on transitioning away from traditional forestry investments to a new model in which returns are based on the intensity “not of timber production but of restoration and protection”.

The impact market has grown from $50bn in 2012 to $1.5trn in 2024, according to Global Impact Investing Network. A “material part” of that increase has been a “recognition” of NbS, Dean said.

Yet NbS investments need to quadruple before 2050 if the world has a chance of meeting its biodiversity and climate targets, he added. While 85% of NbS funding comes from the public sector, Dean noted a “growing pressure” on institutional investors to fill that financing gap, which won’t come from public sources.

Anna Väänänen, head of listed impact equity at AXA IM, stressed an increase in investor interest in the listed equity space too. The demand has been partly driven by the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and the publication of the Task Force for Nature-related Financial Disclosure’s (TNFD) reporting recommendations. As a result, a “broad” base of investors are now looking to include nature-related targets in their investment strategies.

Moreover, this interest transcends the anti-ESG movement, especially the on-going environmental rollbacks happening in the US under the second Donald Trump presidency.

“Every single business in the world is in some way dependent on functioning ecosystem services,” she said. “It’s very important to have a future-proof business model. That’s just how good investors run their portfolios. It does not depend on how politics comes and goes.”

Mismatch between risk awareness and investment

Even with this is unprecedented demand for NbS, a recent survey by investment manager Nuveen highlighted a mismatch between nature risk awareness and nature investment strategies. While 45% of the surveyed institutions identify nature loss as a top five economic risk, only three in 10 are increasing their focus on nature-related themes within their portfolios.

In private markets, one of reasons for the lag may be that it’s “very hard for some asset owners to decide where to allocate to nature”, according to Dean.

“Large asset owners have rigid allocation policies when it comes to targeting a risk-return for a certain asset class,” he said. “They may not always know how to treat NbS.”

NbS are not an asset class but a “series of activities” which can be structured through a variety of asset classes on both the listed and unlisted side. This may confuse asset owners, who often need to put NbS “into a box” before they commit.

“I would suggest treating NbS like an infrastructure investment due to their long-term financing structures, operator developer models, and offtake agreements,” he said.

Investors that already have forestry or agriculture allocations may find it easier to allocate to NbS, he added.

Here, asset managers can play a role by offering a “diverse range of investment solutions”. “I certainly see our alternative asset manager peer group moving in this direction,” he said.


More on this:

Tony Juniper: Nature recovery and sustainable farming are an opportunity, not a threat to investors


Related Content