CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
Hortense Bioy, global director of sustainability research at Morningstar
Briefs

Returns from green investment funds fall behind peers in short term

Only four out of 10 ESG funds outperformed their traditional counterparts in 2022, according to new data shared with Net Zero Investor. 

While ESG funds proved resilient last year, in terms of flows, attracting over $157 billion of net new money globally, their returns suffered, and in many categories, more than traditional funds.

In 2022, a minority (41%) of ESG funds in the sample outperformed their average traditional peers.

Last year was tough for investors, with inflationary pressures, rising interest rates, recession fears, and the energy crisis impacting almost all asset classes.

However, average returns and success rates across the sample suggested there was no performance trade-off associated with ESG funds over the medium and long term. 

In fact, over three, five, and 10 years, the average ESG fund beat its average traditional peer.

The Morningstar study examined the performance of ESG funds in 17 European Morningstar Categories, including 12 most popular, over the past one, three, five, and 10 years through December 2022. The selected categories were determined based on the availability of ESG funds with 10-year returns.

Sector bias

According to Morningstar, the poor performance for ESG funds in 2022 can be mainly attributed to sector biases. Relative to traditional funds, many ESG funds have a structural underweighting to the energy sector, which was the best-performing unit of the Morningstar Global Markets Index last year, gaining 34%.

ESG funds also tend to be overweight in technology, industrials, and healthcare relative to traditional funds. In 2022, technology was among the worst performing sectors in the Morningstar Global Markets Index, losing 32.2%.

Hortense Bioy, global director of sustainability research at Morningstar, said: “Trade-offs and performance of ESG investments will continue be debated and researched. But what we found again by analysing ESG funds in the most popular asset classes is that there is no performance trade-off over the medium and long term.

“That’s important for sustainability-oriented investors because of the persistent perception that ESG-based investing requires a performance sacrifice.”

Passive investment now represents almost a quarter of ESG fund assets globally, with asset management giant BlackRock increasingly dominating the space, according to Bioy.


Related Content