CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
Briefs

Shareholder group calls for vote against BP’s chair

Follow This, a shareholder activist group, has called for a vote against BP’s chair in a bid to put climate concerns on the agenda at the firm’s upcoming AGM.

The campaign group urges investors to vote against the reappointment of BP chair Helge Lund, in protest against the firm’s U-turn on climate and its decision not to consult shareholders.

BP, which has been struggling with falling share prices over the past year, announced that it was to significantly scale back its net zero ambitions at a capital markets day last month.

CEO Murray Auchincloss promised shareholders a “fundamental reset”, including a £10bn increase in investment on new oil and gas production and significantly scaling back investments in clean energy.

But the decision was not universally welcomed, with long-term asset owners raising concerns about the firm’s transition strategy and its failure to consult investors.

Last month, a group of investors including Robeco, Rathbones and Phoenix Group sent a letter to BP chair Helge Lund, urging him to give shareholders a say in its climate goals. Yet the appeal was ignored, with no formal vote on climate included in the agenda for the firm’s AGM, which is due to be held on 17 April.

Shareholders have also now missed a deadline to file resolutions. BP’s “fundamental reset” was announced after the deadline for filing resolutions had passed, leaving investors with no other options, Follow This founder Mark van Baal points out.

“Voting against the board is the only way for shareholders to express their dissent over BP’s refusal to allow a vote on its strategy U-turn.”

“A significant vote against Helge Lund’s re-election will send a clear message: BP’s leadership must listen to all shareholders, not just one alleged short-term activist investor,” adds van Baal, alluding to the activist investor Elliott, which has taken a £3.8bn stake in BP, becoming its third-largest shareholder. Elliott’s position has been widely interpreted as a push to adopt a wider focus on fossil fuels.

Other major shareholders are Norges Bank Investment Management, BlackRock, and Vanguard, according to MarketScreener.


BP investors push for a vote on climate goals

BP's transition strategy challenged

Podcast: where next for BP? with Nick Mazan

Content Tags: Engagement  Agriculture  Europe  UK  In-Brief 

Related Content