CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
News & Views

Investors put pressure on Woodside Energy over climate concerns

ACCR and $81bn HESTA have put pressure on Woodside Energy ahead of its 2024 AGM but will $316bn AustralianSuper, a major shareholder, do the same?

The Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR) has filed a members’ statement with Australian oil and gas company Woodside Energy opposing the re-election of chairman Richard Goyder over climate concerns.

In the members’ statement, ACCR, a research and shareholder advocacy organisation representing investors, claimed that Goyder has been “persistently unresponsive” to shareholder concerns over climate risk management.

“Under the chairmanship of Richard Goyder, the current board has resisted change in the wake of major shareholder votes at the last four Annual General Meetings (AGMs), each relating to its failure to deliver a credible strategy that will maximise shareholder value in the face of the global energy transition,” ACCR said.

The members’ statement for resolution will be voted on at Woodside Energy’s AGM on 24 April 2024.

ACCR warns that the company continues to allocate the majority of its capital to developing oil and gas projects, its Scope 1 and 2 decarbonisation targets are also not Paris-aligned, offsets dominating its transition strategy and Woodside has not a Scope 3 target.

Along with institutional investors Vision Super and Betashares, ACCR co-filed members’ statements with Woodside Energy Group at its 2023 AGM, calling on directors to be held accountable for the board’s repeated failure to present a credible climate strategy.

At the 2023 AGM, Woodside’s long- standing director Ian Macfarlane suffered a vote of 35% against his re-election over climate concerns.

In the most recent member’ statement, ACCR warned that Woodside’s net zero strategy  has “not materially changed” since last year. On top of that, disclosures in the 2023 Investor Briefing Day indicate that the company is persisting with its carbon-intensive growth portfolio that appears less value-accretive than a capital return strategy.

“The chair carries ultimate responsibility for the company’s direction, and therefore it is the chair who must be held accountable for Woodside’s current approach,” ACCR said.

HESTA action

Alongside ACCR, $81bn Australian pension fund HESTA, has also applied pressure onto Woodside Energy ahead of the 2024 AGM season.

Last month, HESTA, which owns a 0.8% stake in Woodside as of 8 March, urged the company to consider appointing new directors who are equipped to manage climate-related challenges.

The pension fund said that it believes Woodside should prioritise adding new energy and business transformation skills to its board.

"As part of this engagement, we shared with Woodside for their consideration, independent and highly credentialed potential director candidates, whose new energy and business transformation skills we believe would add to the board’s current capabilities," HESTA said in a statement.

AustralianSuper’s inaction

Alongside, HESTA, Australian pension funds including, $316bn AustralianSuper and $100bn HostPlus own shares in Woodside Energy.

Australia’s largest pension fund AustralianSuper is one of Woodside’s top five shareholders, reportedly owning 85 million shares in the company across all its investment options, representing 4.5% of the oil and gas provider.

Last week, environmental activist group Market Forces, alongside 40 other organisations, called on AustalianSuper to put Woodside under pressure over its climate strategy at its 2024 AGM.

Market Forces accused the fund of backing Woodside on all items at its 2023 AGM, while firms like BlackRock and Vanguard refused to back some items.

According to an analysis by the group, AustralianSuper was the only major super fund to “backpedal” on climate action at Woodside’s 2023 AGM by failing to increase pressure on the company through its voting behaviour.

This is despite the fact that the AustralianSuper’s 2023 Climate Change Report stated that Woodside Energy is amongst the top 20 contributors to its portfolio emissions.

In response to this, a spokesperson from AustralianSuper said: "As an investor in Woodside, AustralianSuper has been engaging with the company on its approach to climate change and its strategy to transition to a net zero economy.

"We will continue to evaluate Woodside’s decarbonisation plans and engage with the company consistent with our purpose for members."

Like AustralianSuper, HostPlus voted with management on every Woodside 2023 AGM item. 

Net Zero Investor has contacted HostPlus for a response.


Related Content