CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
Article
News & Views

European banks’ green bond issuance ‘skewed away from clean energy investments’

European lenders are ‘failing to unleash the potential’ of green bonds, with lending heavily concentrated on building improvements, despite evidence that clean energy delivers a higher impact on emissions avoidance

Europe’s largest banks are failing to capture the full set of opportunities in green bonds, which account for a mere 1% of bank balance sheet assets, according to new research conducted by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, a US-based independent thinktank.


NZI Transition and Climate Investment Conference | 22 October | London | Register here


The review, conducted among Europe’s 47 largest banks with a combined AUM of €35trn, shows that there remains significant room to allocate more to the transition, with many of Europe’s largest banks only allocating a fraction of their eligible assets to green bonds. ING, Lloyds and Banco Sabadell are cited as examples of banks which have over 75% of their eligible green asset pools unallocated.

The European green bond market is also concentrated, with 15 banks accounting for more than 75% of total issuance. Crédit Agricole, Société Générale, BNP Paribas, CaixaBank and Santander are among the largest private financiers of the transition.

While total green bond issuance is growing, with some €240bn issued by banks cited in the review, roughly 70% of issuance is currently centred on buildings, such as energy-efficient mortgages. This represents a significant loophole, as banks can earmark eligible mortgage balances to green bond proceeds, even if the funding does not directly fund new building upgrades, the authors point out.

In contrast, clean energy lending accounts for less than a third of total bond issuance, and banks are still lagging behind on capitalising on grid infrastructure buildouts, the report argues.

“This composition of allocations does not squarely address Europe’s clean transition and resilience needs,” said Kevin Leung, sustainable debt analyst, credit markets Europe, at IEEFA. “More credible green bond programmes should therefore actively align funding with a well-represented set of transition-critical assets, which have low climate risk exposure.”

When it comes to emissions reduction impact, bonds funding clean energy projects appear to be significantly more effective. They account for more than 90% of avoided emissions per year, despite representing less than a third of debt issued, the research shows.

Bank's shortcomings in funding the transition have increasingly caught the eye of long-term asset owners. Among others, Brunel Pension Partnership and thr Church of England Pension Board have been engaging with Barclays, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley calling for disclosure of a Clean Energy Financing Ratio. Brunel has also used credit manager selection as a lever, examining how credit managers integrate ESG factors into lending decisions. 

European banks’ green bond issuance ‘skewed away from clean energy investments’

Related Content