CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
News & Views

Investors worth $25trn push back on ‘laggard’ mining companies

A coalition of investors are set to engage with 100+ mining companies to adopt global tailings standards.

A $25trn investor initiative, including the Church of England Pensions Board, have vowed to target “laggard” mining companies not committing to international standards.

New research presented at a global roundtable of the Investor Mining and Tailings Safety Initiative revealed that 77 major publicly listed mining firms have now committed to adopt the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM), however 126 smaller companies are yet to commit.

Hence, at the roundtable, convened by the £3.2bn Church of England Pension Board, the $25trn investor initiative vowed to lead on engaging with these remaining companies to implement the GISTM within the next 12 months. 

The roundtable was held of the eve (24 January) of the fifth anniversary of the Brumadinho disaster which led to the loss of 272 lives when a tailings dam collapsed in Brazil in 2019.

bxs-quote-alt-left

Those companies not committing to the standard are clearly labelling themselves as an increased risk in investors’ portfolios.

bxs-quote-alt-right
Adam Matthews, chief responsible investment officer, Church of England Pensions Board.

Church of England Pension Board

Adam Matthews, chair of the Investor Mining and Tailings Safety Initiative and chief responsible investment officer for the Church of England Pensions Board said: Those companies not committing to the standard are clearly labelling themselves as an increased risk in investors’ portfolios, and for insurers, banks and to the communities and environment in which they operate.

“They also undermine efforts by the whole sector to address the systemic issue of tailings waste and as such they will be the intense focus of a renewed investor engagement.”

The Church of England Pension Board are known for taking an active stance on big emitters, with the fund offloading its stake in supermajor Shell as it declared that it was looking to end all of its investment in the oil and gas sector last year.

Investors joining the Church of England Pension Board in the initiative include Border to Coast Pension Partnership, CalSTRS, Lothian Pension Fund, UBS, USS, Swedish AP Fund AP2, AP4, AP7 and Allianz Investment Management.


RENEWABLE INFRASTRUCTURE SUMMIT
12/03/24, London | Asset owner knowledge sharing & due diligence


Patrick Peura, ESG engagement manager for Allianz Investment Management said: “The Investor Mining and Tailings Safety Initiative has been critical to not only show the benefit but also the need for investors to convene on such critical systemic issues in the mining sector.

“Companies not reporting in line with the standard raise the serious concern that they have not yet taken this opportunity to align their assets and operational standards. This is necessary to appropriately reduce risks against human and capital loss – something that is not acceptable in any industry.

“We are therefore committed to lead, along with other investors, the continued engagement with these non-responding companies.”

bxs-quote-alt-left

Companies not reporting in line with the standard raise the serious concern that they have not yet taken this opportunity to align their assets and operational standards.

bxs-quote-alt-right
Patrick Peura, ESG engagement manager, Allianz Investment Management.

50% of market committed

The new research also revealed that alongside the 77 mining companies who have committed to the standard, an additional 36 either committing to reviewing the standard or are in the process of implementation.

Taken together these 113 companies represent 64.43% of the market by capitalisation of all listed mining companies. Of which those committed to GISTM are 51.76 of the market.

Matthews added: “Over half of listed mining firms, by market value, are now committed to the GISTM. This is a significant step by many companies to implement what is an exacting best practice standard. It means this Standard is now the norm for the market.”


Related Content